A. Defendant B shall register the branch court of the Daegu District Court and January 1, 1999.

A. ① On March 20, 2017, the Daegu District Court Branch Decision 2017Hu1442, the Plaintiff filed a claim for reimbursement against E, “E shall pay to the Plaintiff 125,378,393 won and 47,264,817 won per annum from March 17, 2017 to the date of full payment” the payment order became final and conclusive on May 27, 2017; ② As to the real estate listed in the separate list owned by E (hereinafter “instant real estate”), the Defendant B did not have any dispute over the establishment registration of a mortgage over the maximum debt amount of KRW 30,00,000,00,000 among the maximum debt amount of KRW 125,378,393 and the maximum debt amount of KRW 47,264,817, and each of the Defendant C shall have no dispute over the establishment registration of a mortgage between the parties’ respective 100,005,00 won and the maximum debt amount of KRW 1605,7.05,005,7.

B. According to the above facts, it is determined that the secured claim of each of the above secured claims established between January 11, 1999 and October 27, 2001 with respect to the instant real estate has expired due to the completion of prescription.

In regard to this, Defendant B and C alleged that there was a separate agreement between E and each other to extend the period of prescription prior to the completion of the statute of limitations. However, each of the descriptions of Evidence Nos. 1, 2 (including paper numbers), 1, 2 (including paper numbers), 1, 2 (including paper numbers) is insufficient to recognize the above assertion, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.

C. Therefore, the Defendants, upon the Plaintiff’s subrogation request, are obligated to perform the registration procedure for cancellation of the relevant right to collateral security to each E.

2. The plaintiff's claim for conclusion is justified and it is so decided as per Disposition.