In the event that the Defendants did not pay the above fines, only 100,000.

1. Defendant A: (a) around 18:00 on August 13, 2013, and around 18:00, the Defendant discovered the victim C (Nam, 60 years of age) who was satisfing with the victim; (b) discovered the victim C (Nam, 60 years of age) who was satisfing with the victim; (c) was satisfing with the victim, who was satisfing with the victim, and the victim was satisfing with the victim, and the victim was satisfing with the victim; and (d) caused the victim’s satisfing that the victim’s k

2. Defendant B, at the time, at the time, at the place, as described in paragraph (1) of this Article, was destroyed by the victim’s cell phone call, which was owned by the victim, by cutting off the victim’s cell phone and cutting off the victim’s cell phone to the police and cutting off the victim’s cell phone into the water.

Summary of Evidence

Each police interrogation protocol against the Defendants and C, and application of the law on the victim photograph;

1. Article applicable to criminal facts;

(a) Defendant A: Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act (Selection of Fine)

B. Defendant B: Article 366 of the Criminal Act (Selection of Fine)

2. Defendants to be detained in a workhouse: Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act;

3. Defendants of the provisional payment order: Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act