2. According to the evidence evidence No. 1, the Plaintiff set the interest rate and delay damages rate as 30% per annum between the Defendants on September 5, 2002, and the highest interest rate under Article 2(1) of the Interest Limitation Act was amended by Presidential Decree No. 25376 on June 11, 2014 to “25% per annum” from “30% per annum,” and was enforced from July 15, 2014, Article 2 of the Addenda to the above provision provides that “this Decree shall apply from the date of entering into or renewal of a contract after the enforcement of this Decree,” and Article 2(1) of the Interest Limitation Act (amended by Presidential Decree No. 28413, Nov. 7, 2017 to “25% per annum” from “24% per annum” to “24% per annum,” but it also provides that the Plaintiff may seek renewal damages from the Plaintiff’s main interest rate under Article 2(1) of the Addenda to this Decree, as the Plaintiff’s main interest rate of this case.

Claim against Defendant B and D: Judgment by public notice (Article 208(3)3 of the Civil Procedure Act)

(b) Claim against Defendant C and E: Judgment on deemed confession (Article 208(3)2 of the Civil Procedure Act)