청소년보호법위반
The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.
1. On March 14, 2018, the Defendant sold liquors harmful to juveniles to D (16 years of age), E (16 years of age), and F (17 years of age) around 23:00, which are “C operated by himself/herself in the second and second floors in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Gwanak-gu, Seoul.”
2. The judgment of the court below
A. The court below acknowledged that ① the juveniles as stated in the facts charged were demanding the above juveniles to present their identification cards upon entering the Defendant’s business establishment and ordering the son, ② the above juveniles presented their respective adult resident registration certificates to each of them, ② the Defendant provided their pictures and photographs to each of the above juveniles, ③ the police officers who were dispatched to the present site upon receiving a report to the effect that the juveniles drinking, and ③ the above juveniles confirmed their resident registration certificates presented, but could not determine whether they are other people’s resident registration certificates because their face is similar to their faces on their resident registration certificates. ④ The police officers of the above juveniles can finally see their fingerprints and fingerprints on their resident registration cards and verify that the above juveniles used other people’s resident registration certificates, and the above juveniles could have confirmed their face and face on their face at the time when they presented other people’s resident registration certificates. Thus, the above juveniles cannot be seen as having known or had any other special duty to present their identification cards.