채무부존재확인
1. All appeals filed by the Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) against the instant principal lawsuit and counterclaim are dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be the principal lawsuit.
1. The defendant's grounds for appeal citing the judgment of the court of first instance are not significantly different from the allegations in the court of first instance, and even if all the evidence submitted in the court of first instance are examined, the fact-finding and judgment of the court of first instance
Therefore, this court's reasoning is consistent with the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance except for the dismissal of part of the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance as set forth in the following paragraph (2). Thus, this court's reasoning is cited in accordance with the main sentence of
2. A-B of the grounds of the judgment of the court of first instance, which was accepted after the dismissal.
this subsection shall be filled by the following:
B. On November 5, 2014, the Defendant was diagnosed as a result of the internal landscape test conducted by C Hospital on November 5, 2014, that “work-type cancer and the training life (the classification code under the Korean Standard Disease Disease Classification: D012, D126) of an unidentified,” and was subject to the internal anti-pactation and anti-pactation.
Then, on December 30, 2014, the Defendant was diagnosed as the “workplace Symical Organism (Korean Standard Disease Classification Code: C19)” with regard to the disease at the Jeonnam University Hospital, and was diagnosed as the “workplace Symical Organism (Korean Standard Disease Classification Code: C19).
The first instance court's first instance judgment's first instance judgment's first instance judgment's first instance judgment's second instance judgment's "uses by the defendant" shall be "uses removed as above."
The first instance court’s fourth 15-17 of the first instance judgment stated the “only from the above provision to the evidence alone” as the evidence Nos. 1 and 5 (in the case of the evidence No. 7, referring to the diagnosis document of the Jeonnam University Hospital) prepared by the doctor within the Jeonnam University Hospital (refer to the statement of the evidence No. 7) who is not a clinical pathology or clinical pathology as stipulated in the above provision, and other evidence submitted by the Defendant.”
3. In conclusion, the judgment of the court of first instance is legitimate, and all appeals against the principal lawsuit and counterclaim of the defendant are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.