A. Plaintiffs A, C, D, and G (Death on October 18, 1998) who were indicted and convicted by the prosecution of the prosecution of the prosecution of the prosecution of the prosecution of the prosecution of the prosecution of the prosecution of the prosecution of the prosecution of the prosecution of the prosecution of the prosecution of the prosecution

(B) After the first instance court, the appellate court, the court of final appeal, and the second instance (Seoul High Court Decision 82No2725 delivered on February 16, 1983; hereinafter referred to as the “the first instance judgment”), the judgment of the court below was rendered following the first instance court (Seoul High Court Decision 82No2725 delivered on February 16, 1983; hereinafter referred to as the “the judgment on review”), the 10 years of imprisonment and suspension of qualifications, 7 years of suspension of qualifications and 7 years of imprisonment, 1 year and 6 months of suspension of qualifications and 1 year and 1 year and 6 months of suspension of qualifications and 1 year and 6 months of suspension of qualifications, Ga and 1 year and 6 months of suspension of qualifications, Da, 1 year and 1 June and 3 years of suspension of qualifications, respectively.

B. Around July 9, 2007, the Truth Reconciliation Commission’s decision and the past reorganization committee for the truth and reconciliation of new judgment decided to the effect that the instant case is subject to a confession made by coercion, long-term confinement, adviser, etc., and that the truth is needed.

Plaintiff

On April 21, 200, Plaintiff E, the wife of A, B, C, D, and net G filed a request for a review of the original judgment with the Seoul High Court, and the said court rendered a decision of commencing a retrial and conducting a hearing on May 21, 2009 and January 14, 201 that all the facts charged guilty in the original judgment was not guilty or acquitted (Seoul High Court Decision 2000No6, May 21, 2009; Seoul High Court Decision 2009No70, May 21, 2009; hereinafter referred to as “instant new judgment”). The said new judgment became final and conclusive as it is,.

(c) Family members, inheritance-related plaintiffs E, and F as their wife and children of the network G, the inheritance shares are 2/3 of the shares of plaintiffs E and 1/3 of the shares of plaintiffs F.