However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On August 15, 2017, the Defendant: (a) around 01:50, the Daejeon Seodong C Apartment Park 412, and (b) under the influence of alcohol, “A person who runs the opening of a door to another person’s house and sound at another person’s house.” Upon receiving a report from 112, the police officer E belonging to the Sungsung Police Station D police station called up with the call for returning home, and assaulted the said E’s reciting to walk one time.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on handling 112 reports.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the protocol of private oral statement to E;

1. Relevant Article 136 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for the reason that Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (including the circumstances in which the defendant was the first offender and his mistake is divided) is above Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act.