However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

On April 8, 2016, the Defendant was in front of the “C” restaurant located in the Busan Shodong-gu B of Busan on April 23:55, 2016, and the Defendant did not calculate the drinking and drinking in the said restaurant, and did not notify the Defendant of the drinking and drinking in the said restaurant, and was dispatched to the police officer E who was called upon receiving a report of 112 on the charge of all-time flight.

In the past, I am, called "I am, am, and am, I am, am, and am, followed, I am am sather, and assaulted the part of the above E with a view to being satched for men who were in possession of sather and satched.

Accordingly, the defendant assaulted police officers to interfere with legitimate performance of official duties concerning crime prevention and suppression.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statements made to F and E;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Grounds for sentencing under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The scope of the recommended punishment according to the sentencing guidelines [the scope of the recommended punishment] and the basic area (six months to one year and four months) (no person subject to special sentencing] shall interfere with the performance of public duties;

2. The same sentence as the order shall be imposed in consideration of the circumstances, such as the absence of criminal records exceeding the fine determined by the sentence, the recognition of the crime and the depth of the mistake, and the police officers who have committed violence want to break their wife;