However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The defendant is a person engaged in the operation of B windowatom car.

Around 21:30 on November 29, 2013, the Defendant: (a) was under the influence of alcohol with 0.139% alcohol concentration; (b) but it was difficult to drive the said car normally, such as 0.139%, by driving the said car at a 63-2-lane level; (c) while driving the said two-lane road at a 0-lane level from the inside and outside of the city, the said place is installed at the center line of the yellow light boat and the center separation cost; (d) while driving the said vehicle at a 0-day level, the Defendant was negligent in performing the duty of care to thoroughly operate the said vehicle with the upper left side of the said road; (e) while driving the said vehicle at a 1-day level, the victim’s 1-day treatment of the said vehicle at a 1-day level, such as 4-day bar from the front end of the said road; and (e) the victim’s 2-day treatment of the said vehicle at a 1-day level without any further contact with the victim’s necessary treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A report on the proper launch of a drinking driver, a report on the results of the control of drinking driving, and a report on the situation of drinking driving;

1. Each written diagnosis (C, E, F, G);

1. Application of the Act and subordinate statutes to a survey report on actual condition, a field photograph and an accident vehicle photograph at the time of the accident;

1. Article 5-11 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes as to the crime (the point of causing danger driving) and Article 148-2 (2) 2 of the Road Traffic Act (the point of driving).