However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On December 4, 2014, the Defendant: (a) around 21:00, at the main point of “E” operated by the victim D in Mapo-gu Seoul Mapo-gu Seoul, the Defendant: (b) caused customers to go out of, and caused customers to go out, such as threatening to go out, as they turn out, as they go through the two-way disease; and (c) obstructed the victim’s main points operation duties by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Application of F’s written Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act is that the Defendant, on November 18, 2014, reported the Defendant to the police by interference with business, etc. (in relation to the Defendant, a summary order of KRW 2 million was issued to the Defendant) on the ground that the Defendant reported the Defendant to the police (around November 18, 2014, a summary order of KRW 2 million was issued to the Defendant), and again, obstructed the victim’s business by finding the main points

However, in consideration of the fact that there is an agreement with the victim and the fact that it has not been found in the above main points, the execution shall be suspended, and the sentence shall be determined as per the order.

Public Prosecution Rejection Parts

1. On December 4, 2014, the summary of the facts charged: (a) around 21:20, the Defendant: “Around December 21:20, 2014, the Defendant was the victim who was reported at the main station by 112, and was dispatched from H of the border of the Seoul Mapo-gu Police Station G District, Seoul, which was the victim, and was dispatched to the Defendant; and (b) was the victim before the customer F, E, E, and the victim, including the customer F, E, E, I would like to grow Chewing, ring, and die.”; and (c) was sexually insulting the victim.

2. Determination

(a) A crime of insult (Article 311 of the Criminal Act): An offense subject to prosecution subject to complaint under Article 312 (1) of the Criminal Act;

B. Revocation of complaint filed by the victim on February 2, 2015, which was subsequent to the institution of public prosecution

(c) Public prosecution dismissal: Article 327 subparagraph 5 of the Criminal Procedure Act;