성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. The decision of the court below on the summary of the grounds for appeal (one hundred months of imprisonment, confiscation) is too unreasonable.
2. It is true that the judgment of the defendant reflects the crime of this case and does not repeat the same mistake again.
However, the act of arranging sexual traffic is not likely to undermine the sound sexual culture and good morals by commercializing women's sex, but it is necessary to severely punish sexual traffic business establishments to prevent the spread of illegal sexual traffic business establishments and to establish a sound sexual culture.
In particular, even though the Defendant had a record of criminal punishment in 2008 and 2012 by arranging sexual traffic at the same place as the place of the instant crime, it is not good that the instant crime is committed again.
In addition, comprehensively taking account of the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, details and details of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, etc., the sentencing conditions specified in the instant records and pleadings do not seem to be unfair because the sentence imposed by the lower court is too unreasonable.
Therefore, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.
3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.