유족급여및장의비부지급처분취소
1. On February 15, 2013, the Defendant’s disposition of bereaved family benefits and funeral expense against the Plaintiff is revoked.
2...
1. Details of the disposition;
A. On April 17, 1993, the network B (CB; hereinafter “the network”) entered Samsung Electronic Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Tsung”) and worked for 6 years and 2 months in the gold line connecting process of this Agreement, which is 2 Dr., a semiconductor business unit, and retired on June 30, 199 due to reasons beyond the health, such as old soil and water fals, etc.
B. On May 3, 200, the deceased received a diagnosis of the boundary nature of the accident in the left side at the Yancheon University Hospital, and undergone an operation on November 27, 2000 on the left side, and around August 2004, the deceased received a diagnosis of the bad scopical scopical scopical scopical scopical scopical scopical scopical scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopics and scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic sc
C. On April 26, 2012, the Plaintiff, as the deceased, claimed that the death of the deceased constituted an occupational accident, and claimed the bereaved family’s benefits and funeral expenses to the Defendant.
On June 25, 2012, the Defendant requested the Korea Occupational Safety and Health Institute to conduct an epidemiological investigation of occupational diseases, and the Korea Occupational Safety and Health Institute conducted an epidemiological investigation of occupational diseases (hereinafter “instant epidemiological investigation”), and sent the result to the Defendant on January 28, 2013.
E. On February 13, 2013, the Daejeon Occupational Disease Determination Committee on the ground that “A hazardous substance known to be related to dysia is asbestos, sloping, radiation, etc. according to the results of the instant epidemiological investigation, but in the process in which the deceased worked, it is determined that the risk of dysium is low since the said substance was not treated in the process, and there is no objective ground for the deceased’s exposure to dysium harmful factors at the work site, and it is difficult to recognize a proximate causal relation between the deceased’s death and the work.”