2. The judgment of the court below is recognized that the defendant recognized the facts charged of this case and reflects his mistake, and that the defendant did not have any criminal records exceeding the same kind or fine. Meanwhile, the crime of this case is recognized as embezzlement of KRW 71 million over 66 times for a period exceeding one year, and its nature is not good, and the defendant did not agree with the victim company or take any particular measures to recover damage, and considering all the sentencing conditions in the records and arguments of this case including the defendant's age, character, character, environment, family relationship, circumstances after the crime, etc., it is not recognized that the sentence of the court below is too unreasonable. Thus, the defendant's argument is without merit.

3. As such, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed under Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.