When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On May 13, 2013, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 2.5 million by the Seoul Western District Court due to a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (drinking).

On August 13, 2020, the Defendant, at around 00:21, 202, driven Dmna 4 automobiles while under the influence of alcohol concentration of about 0.065% from the 2km-gu apartment parking lot in Suwon-gu, Suwon-si, Suwon-si to C, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, and violated Article 44(1) of the Road Traffic Act at least twice.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's legal statement report on the circumstances of the driver placed in driving and notification of the result of regulating drinking driving;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: References to inquiries, such as criminal history, investigation reports (Attachment to summary orders), application of summary orders and other Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article of the Act and Articles 148-2 (1) and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Under the grounds for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, the punishment as ordered shall be determined by comprehensively taking into account the following circumstances and the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, motive and circumstance of the crime, means and consequence of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime, etc., and all the conditions of sentencing as shown in the arguments and records.

Unfavorable circumstances: Along with the same record, recidivism was made even once.

The favorable circumstances: The crime is seriously against the law.

It is true that the vehicle does not repeat again by selling the vehicle.

There is no record of punishment other than before the judgment.