공탁금 출급청구권 확인
1. The plaintiff (Counterclaim defendant)'s appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant).
purport, purport, and.
(2) On April 17, 2013, the Plaintiff and the Defendant deposited KRW 5,792,730 as the Plaintiff and the Defendant as the principal deposit money for the expropriation of the obstacle in the instant land on the grounds that “the Plaintiff and the Defendant asserted that they are their owners and deposit them with the adjudication of expropriation made by the Central Land Expropriation Committee on February 22, 2013.” The details of the obstacle in the instant land are as follows: (a) KRW 5,792,730 as to the expropriation compensation on the obstacle in the instant land as the principal deposit money; and (b) the detailed obstacle in the instant case (hereinafter collectively referred to as “in the instant obstacles”) are as follows.
The kind, structure and size of an article (area 1 mar) shall be 51 mars (h=2m) 30.0 780,000 mars (h=2m) 62 mars (h=2m) 30.0 780,000 mars (h=2m) 70,000 mar 70 mar 70,000 mar mar 12.0 8,000 mar 146,000 mar 146,000 mar 150,000 mar 12.0 mar 146,000 mar mar 1,50 mar mar 30,000 mar mar mar 305,000 mar mar 305,000 mar mar 371,27 mar mar mar m 27.
2. The plaintiff's assertion that each of the obstacles of this case had already existed from the time when the plaintiff's husband owns and manages the land and the house of this case. The plaintiff's husband has owned and managed them, and the plaintiff has owned and managed them after the plaintiff's husband died, so compensation for them should be reverted to the plaintiff. Accordingly, the defendant asserts that compensation for them should be reverted to the defendant since all of the obstacles of this case are owned by the plaintiff's husband.
3. Determination
A. With respect to the obstacles of this case Nos. 1 through 7, the following are recognized by the whole purport of the statement Nos. 4, 5, and 7 and the pleading.