청구이의
1. The judgment of the court of first instance is modified as follows.
A notary public of the defendant against the plaintiffs is a law firm D on 2014.
1. The reasoning for this part of the facts by the court is that the “S” of the first instance judgment No. 5 is “F”; “Evidence No. 1, 2, 8, 35, and 47” of the sixth, “Evidence No. 1, 2, 7, 8, 35, and 47” of the sixth, “Evidence No. 1, 2, 7, 8, 35, and 47” is attached to the corresponding part of the first instance judgment except that the following are added to the subsequent part of the fourth, the second, third, and subsequent part of the fourth, is identical to the corresponding part of the first instance judgment (Class No. 14 through No. 6, No. 11). Therefore, the first instance judgment is cited in accordance with
[Article 4] The date on which E transfers the whole business to Q Co., Ltd. shall be the date of 2014, and F shall pay E in full until the date on which the business transfer is completed: Provided, That if all legal procedures following the business transfer are not completed by the date, E Co., Ltd. and Q Q Co.
2. Summary of the plaintiffs' assertion
A. The plaintiffs' common assertion 1) since the defendant was not a party to the transfer agreement of this case and only lent the name in the preparation of the notarial deed of this case, the defendant cannot be deemed to have actually reverted to the defendant the claim for the acquisition price of the corporation under the notarial deed of this case. Therefore, compulsory execution based on the notarial deed of this case should not be denied. 2) Even though it is apparent that the party to the notarial deed of this case (transferr) was the actual owner of E, and is not the defendant, the defendant was the creditor of the notarial deed of this case by the trust of G, etc., and thus, the notarial deed of this case constitutes a litigation trust and thus is null and void.
Therefore, compulsory execution based on the Notarial Deed of this case should be denied.
3) The instant Notarial Deed is KRW 260,000,000,000 payable payable, out of the F’s corporate acquisition price (hereinafter “instant payable”).
Done at this time.
However, the accounts payable in this case are all repaid as follows, and the sum of F’s damage claims against G, etc. is 837.