When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

피고인은 2011. 5. 31. 경기 화성시 C에 있는 피해자 D가 운영하는 ( 주 )E 사무실에서 피해자에게 ‘ 모친이 집을 샀는데 현재 살고 있는 집이 팔리지 않고 잔금이 모자라니 1,000만원을 빌려 주면 2014. 3. 11. 까지 월급에서 30 만원씩 차감하여 갚겠다 ’라고 거짓말을 하였다.

However, even if the defendant borrows money from the complainant, he did not have the intention or ability to repay it.

The Defendant, as such, by deceiving the victim, received KRW 10 million from the damaged party under his/her pretext as the borrowed money.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A detailed statement of transactions with the target bank;

1. Application of D’s Acts and subordinate statutes on the complaint;

1. Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 347 of the same Act concerning the crime, the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;