However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On April 13, 2014, at around 21:46, the Defendant assaulted the Defendant’s house located in his house, with the Defendant’s wife’s report of 112 that “I will see their difficulties,” and the Defendant’s wife reported that “I would like to die from her house. I would like to see why I would like to see why I would like to see the Defendant’s house that I would like to see, “I would see the Defendant’s flat, flat the flat, and flat the flat of the D’s flat, and that I would like to see the flat at her house.”

Accordingly, the defendant, by force, interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning D's reporting and withdrawal of police officers and domestic violence investigations.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of D police statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of damaged victims;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes and Article 136 of the Election of Imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (Consideration of the fact that the defendant acknowledges the error, there is no record of punishment heavier than the suspension of execution, the circumstances of the crime in this case, and the health conditions of the defendant

1. Probation under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;