A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 6,300,00,000,00,000,000 of imprisonment for eight months.

except that this judgment.

Defendant

A is the representative director of the defendant corporation B who imports early childhood education products (the completes, doors, and teaching equipment) from the Gangnam-gu Seoul building and the third floor.

If it is intended to import a product, the name, size, quantity, price, etc. of the relevant product shall be reported to the head of the customs office, and in filing an import declaration, the importer of the product for children subject to safety verification shall not obtain approval, etc. necessary for import under statutes or obtain such approval by unlawful means, and the importer of the product for children subject to safety verification under the Special Act on Product Safety shall verify that the product for children conforms to safety standards after undergoing a test and inspection on safety by a testing and inspection agency designated for each model of the product for children subject to safety verification, as prescribed by Ordinance of the Ministry

1. On June 27, 2016, the Defendant imported USD 4,576 from 15,898 from 20 to D, from 20, the Busan Customs Office, which was located in 20, as the Busan Customs Office, an import declaration number, the amount of USD 4,576, U.S. dollars 15,898,898.84, the Defendant denied the import of the relevant goods without a safety declaration by issuing the same model confirmation certificate from the Korea Living Environment Examination Institute, a safety certification institution, by using a certificate of self-verification of another model (G), without obtaining the safety confirmation of the relevant goods, and submitting it to the customs office. From June 27, 2016 to May 18, 2017, the Defendant denied the import of the relevant goods by the aforementioned method as follows: KRW 34,155, U.S. dollars 265,021 (cost 306,41,415,416, Nov. 4, 2014

2. A, the representative of Defendant B Defendant B, committed an act of violation as set forth in paragraph 1 in relation to the Defendant’s business at the same date, time, and place as set forth in paragraph 1.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. The protocol concerning the interrogation of the suspect against the defendant A by each prosecutor.