In addition, all appeals filed by the respondent for attachment order and the prosecutor are dismissed.

A. Defendant and the person against whom the attachment order was requested (the guilty part of the judgment of the court below) 1), a mistake of mistake and scenario (a) part of the crime committed by a minor and the person against whom the attachment order was requested (hereinafter “Defendant”).

)가 피해자들에게 집에 가자고 제의하였던 것은 사실이나, 피해자들은 이를 바로 거절하였을 뿐 위와 같은 꾐에 빠져 하자 있는 의사표시를 한 사실이 없으며, 또 이러한 제의 정도로는 피해자들이 자유로운 생활관계 등에서 이탈하여 피고인의 사실적 지배로 옮겨질 가능성도 거의 없었으므로, 형법상 미성년자유인죄에서 말하는 유인행위의 ‘실행의 착수’는 없었다고 보아야 한다. (나) 공무집행방해죄 부분 피해자인 경찰의 진술에 신빙성이 부족할 뿐 아니라, 설혹 피고인이 경찰을 폭행하였던 것이 사실이라 하더라도 이는 요건을 갖추지 않은 위법한 현행범 체포에 대하여 경미하게 항거한 것에 불과하므로, 이러한 행위를 공무집행방해로 의율할 수는 없다고 보아야 한다. 2) 양형부당 원심의 형량(징역 1년, 집행유예 2년, 보호관찰, 80시간의 사회봉사)은 지나치게 무거워서 부당하다.

B. Prosecutor 1) In the part of the Defendant case case, the lower court found the Defendant guilty on the ground that the Defendant’s act did not reach the degree of indecent act by force. However, the Defendant, a male under the age of 46, approaching the victim, who was only ten, was sufficient to evaluate that the Defendant’s act was an indecent act as being in contravention of ordinary people’s sexual humiliation and aversion and good morals. As such, the lower court erred in the misunderstanding of facts. (B) In so doing, the lower court erred by misapprehending the law of mistake of facts. (3) In so doing, the lower court’s sentence against the Defendant on the convicted part of the lower judgment is unreasonable.