If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

At around 12:00 on August 7, 2016, the Defendant sent pet dogs (e.g., g., g., 7 g., 24 g., 80 m.) owned by the Defendant out of the vehicle, which were located in the “Dpenta Corporation” located in the Dpenta-gun, Gangwon-gun, the Defendant brought the victim E (n.e., g., f., 31 years of age) to the Defendant’s pet, and brought the pet dog out of the vehicle.

In such cases, despite the duty to take preventive measures to prevent pet dog from causing others by taking measures, such as cutting a pet dog or cutting a pet dog, the Defendant did not take such measures as giving a pet dog to his pet dog used as a pet dog, and caused the victim to go against the victim’s face by negligence, which led the pet dog to go against the victim and the victim’s face is asked.

Defendant 2 caused the victim to suffer bodily injury, such as the inner part, in need of treatment for about 21 days, due to the above negligence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. A medical certificate for each injury and a medical certificate;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of victims;

1. Article 266 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 266 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Consideration, such as the fact that it appears that the mental and physical shock suffered by the victim seems to be sufficient in light of the part and degree of the reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act in the provisional payment order;