If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

1. In a situation where the Defendant lacks the ability to discern things or make decisions due to a mental retardation or shock disorder, the Defendant intruded into the structure managed by the victim in order to steals the form of DNA from the female toilet managed by the victimized person, whose name is located on the first floor of the military building in Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si on December 10, 2016.

2. In a situation where the Defendant lacks the ability to discern things or make decisions due to a mental retardation or shock disorder, the Defendant, around January 4, 2017, when around 16:00, when he/she was unable to know the names on the third floor of the E building in Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, the Defendant invadedd the structure managed by the victim by entering the relevant door in order to steals the appearance of the female toilet managed by the victimized person who was unable to know the names.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. A statement prepared by the F;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to investigative reports (Attachment to images taken by the victim at the time of committing the crime);

1. Relevant Article 319 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting a crime and Article 319 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Article 10 (2) and Article 55 (1) 6 of the Criminal Act to mitigate mental and physical weakness;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act - The sentencing of a juvenile protective disposition under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act - Unfavorable circumstances: Although there are several times of records of juvenile protective disposition due to the same kind of crime, it has been committed again; - favorable circumstances: the defendant reflects the defendant's age of 19 years old, misjudgments the defendant's age; his mental health was not able to protect the defendant's parents with strong protective intent; and D does not want to punish the defendant;