1. On March 14, 2016, the Defendant, at around March 2016, borrowed KRW 30 million from the victim D, who was a branch in the office of Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government C Co., Ltd., Ltd., the Defendant borrowed KRW 640,00,00,000 from the Plaintiff, who was a branch in the name of the Party B Co., Ltd., located in Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, as security for the branch.

C A vehicle is in fact a vehicle under the name of a stock company, but it is paying all the rent, and if the vehicle is sold by paying a large amount of rent, it can be paid at least KRW 30 million.

If a person lends KRW 30 million, he/she stated to the effect that he/she would repay the above borrowed money and immediately repay the money after collecting the vehicle.

However, in fact, E paid most of the rent of the above vehicle, and returned the vehicle to the leased company immediately, so the Defendant did not have the right to sell the above vehicle solely, and the market price of the above vehicle was higher than KRW 20 million at the time of the lease, and the Defendant did not have the intent or ability to pay it even if he borrowed money from the damaged party due to the absence of any specific property and income.

The Defendant: (a) by deceiving the victim as above; (b) obtained the money of KRW 30 million from the victim on March 14, 2016 from the victim to the one bank account in the name of the Defendant under the name of one bank; and (c) obtained the money from the victim.

2. Around October 2016, the Defendant of fraud, around October 2016, may immediately start the operation of the Internet shopping mall to the victim at a place where it is impossible to know the victim of Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (hereinafter referred to as the Gangnam-gu, Seoul) around October 2016.

Therefore, the purport of the lending of KRW 9 million to the effect that it shall be repaid within one week.

However, the defendant is true.