However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On June 9, 2019, at around 08:10, the Defendant received a report that “the Defendant was subject to violence” on the front side of Michuhol-gu Incheon, Michuhol-gu, Incheon, and committed assault, such as double times of the vessels of the said D by drinking on a sudden hand, and double times of the left hand of the said D’s left hand, while having heard the circumstances of the instant case by a policeman belonging to the Incheon Michuhol-gu Police Station C District District, which was called up.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of reported cases by police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of D police statement;

1. E statements;

1. On-site video CDs;

1. Application of investigation reports (verification and attachment of on-site images by police officers) Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. In light of all the circumstances, such as the fact that the reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act is not good, but the initial crime and the mistake are recognized, and the defendant appears to have been under the influence of alcohol to the extent that he would perform abnormal behavior at the time of committing the crime, etc.