2. The defendant.

A. C (hereinafter “instant project”) project operator on May 2, 2013: Defendant

B. The Central Land Expropriation Committee’s ruling of expropriation on November 21, 2013 (1) held 3,300/9,567 shares in Gyeonggi-gun E farm site owned by the Plaintiff (hereinafter “instant land”) is 9,567 square meters.

(2) The date of expropriation of the Plaintiff’s share in the instant land, each obstacle owned by the Plaintiff, which existed on the instant land (hereinafter “each obstacle”), and each compensation for the Plaintiff’s share in the instant land (hereinafter “the instant money business”) for the amount recognized as follows: (a) KRW 191,362,740 of the Plaintiff’s share in the instant land (3,300/9,567) and KRW 206,930,650 of the instant money business (3 months’ business suspension compensation) and KRW 57,650,000 of the instant money business (3 months business suspension compensation) and KRW 45,943,390: (b) the date of expropriation of the instant land: (c) the Plaintiff’s assertion on January 14, 2014 that the Plaintiff’s share in the instant land should be included in the Plaintiff’s compensation for losses, and (d) the Plaintiff’s assertion that the Plaintiff’s remaining increase in the Plaintiff’s compensation for losses should be included in the Plaintiff’s claim 150 or 15.

2. The plaintiff's assertion

A. The heads of money are suspected of emitting malodor, and it is difficult to find a site to transfer the two kinds of money separately in the vicinity of the site for the instant facilities for the fish farming. Therefore, the heads of money in this case must compensate for losses for the closure of business.

B. Even if the instant amount of money business is not subject to loss compensation, the site for the instant amount of money business is at least 1,000 square meters, so the site for the instant amount of money business shall be secured at least 1,000 square meters for relocation, and local governments shall be secured.