On December 2, 2012, 2012, the Defendant accepted the Defendant’s offer of “C” with the name infinite (one named “C”, hereinafter “C”) that “I will deposit a corporate account with a bank, opening a business registration certificate or power of attorney, and give KRW 50,00 won per face to transfer the passbook, cash card, security card creation device, etc.” to the bank.

1. In a case where a bank interference with business opens a corporate name account, if the fact that the certificate of employment of the applicant is false, the opening of the relevant corporate account shall not be permitted if it is found that the certificate of employment of the applicant is false, and if it is found that the certificate of employment of the applicant is false after the next year, the power of attorney of the applicant for opening the relevant corporate account and documents proving his status are important documents, such as suspension of transaction of the relevant account. In addition, if the relevant account is used for crimes such as Bophishing, etc., the bank shall be liable to compensate for damage under the Electronic Financial Transactions Act depending on negligence. Thus, whether the relevant corporation is a normal corporation, whether the applicant for opening the

The Defendant has been aware that the documents in different names received from C for the opening of an account in the name of a juristic person in excess of 35 types, and that the documents under the name of the said juristic person were not normal, and that many accounts of the said juristic person are opened in a short period of time, that a large number of accounts are paid for an abnormal amount of money than normal business agent, and that the organization of the Bophishing fraud crime reported in the news, etc. is soliciting the passbook in the above manner.