beta
(영문) 수원지방법원성남지원 2012.07.26 2011가합6409

소유권이전등기등

Text

1. At the same time, the Defendant received KRW 596,960,000 from the Plaintiffs:

A. Plaintiff Incorporated Co., Ltd.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On May 12, 2010, the Defendant entered into a provisional contract with the Plaintiffs on May 12, 2010, as indicated in the sales contract (No. 1-1 of the evidence No. 1-2), but there is no dispute between the parties that the actual party to the said provisional contract is the Plaintiffs, and thus, the Plaintiffs are deemed the parties concerned. The Plaintiffs are deemed to be the Plaintiffs, as there is no dispute between the parties that the actual party to the said provisional contract is the Plaintiffs. The Plaintiffs are: (a) 2,400 square meters prior to Hanam-si, 506 square meters; (b) 912 square meters prior to G; (c) 1,408 square meters prior to G; (d) 46,612 square meters of H forest; (e) 77 square meters of forest land; (e) 641 square meters of J site; and (e) 21 square meters

A) The sale of forest land shall be KRW 3 billion. M forest land shall be sold only for the remaining land except for the portion with five graves ($ 11,570 square meters), and the remaining portion, which is not sold, shall be owned by the seller (the defendant). In the event that division is impossible, a provisional contract was entered into with the buyer to divide ownership. In the absence of any change in the seller’s name by August 13, 2010, the buyer and the buyer entered into this contract (hereinafter “instant provisional contract”).

(2) On September 10, 2010, the Defendant reversed the instant provisional contract with Plaintiff B and agreed to conclude a subsequent sales contract according to the following contents:

(2) In the event that the compensation exceeds KRW 300 million, the seller bears the responsibility for the payment of the purchase price (hereinafter “instant agreement”) (1) KRW 3 billion; (3) KRW 4,000 around the grave out of M forest land shall be owned by the seller; and (4) Roads shall be used by both parties.

B. On September 13, 2010, the Plaintiffs, including the conclusion of a sales contract, entered into three sales contracts with the Defendant (hereinafter collectively referred to as “each of the instant sales contracts”; and, if an individual contract is indicated, “the first, second, and third sales contracts” in sequence. At the time of entering into each of the above sales contracts, the Plaintiff signed each of the sales contracts as the Defendant’s guarantor.

On the other hand.