When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

No person shall transfer or lend any means of access used to issue instructions on transactions in electronic financial transactions or to secure the authenticity and accuracy of users and the details of transactions.

Nevertheless, at around 17:00 on September 6, 2013, the Defendant: (a) sent the e-mail card to the Seoul Terminal in front of the Tae-Eup apartment in Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-do; (b) sent the e-mail card and the e-mail card and the e-mail card; and (c) transferred the means of access used in electronic financial transactions, such as the e-mail card and the e-mail to another person using the e-mail card and the e-mail in order to inform the e-mail card and the password of the e-mail card and the e-mail; and (d) receive the e-mail card and the e-mail every 4 days every e-mail.

Summary of Evidence

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Each police statement of the F, G, H, I, J, K, and L;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the details of the results of processing the Internet banking immediately after transfer, response data, each commission, and reply letter;

1. Article 49 (4) 1 and Article 6 (3) 1 of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;