A. The Defendant’s expression “Korean Language Department is very low.m.thm police officers are good” is an expression of an abstract judgment or sacrific sentiment that may undermine the social assessment of the victim.

B. In full view of the following: (a) the victim and E consistently stated that they had consistently expressed the expression “new”; (b) several times during the arrest process, the police officer called “news before many people”; and (c) there was time to consider whether the victim was a victim after making such remarks; and (d) there was sufficient time to consider whether the Defendant had made such remarks.

It is recognized that the phrase "reck" should be added to the public book.

2. Determination on the grounds for appeal

A. At around 18:00 on March 27, 2018, the Defendant: (a) requested the victim D, a police officer belonging to the Seoul Nowon-gu Police Station C Zone C District, to “slicker” who was called the victim and confirmed the details of the report from the reporter after receiving a report from 112 at the roadside of the Defendant’s 4th floor of the Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Nowon-gu, Nowon-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City’s 4th floor; (b) however, the victim’s refusal to respond before dealing with the 112 reported matters; and (c) the victim was reported by the patient and his employees, the victim “hicker so that the real force of the police officers in the Korean Language Habathm is good; and (d) continued to talk with the victim and the victim, and said, “I am more safe after the police ki.”

Accordingly, the defendant openly insultingd the victim.

B. First of all, determination 1: “The Defendant was aware of the fact that the Defendant had kidd against the victim.”

We examine whether the following facts or circumstances recognized by the record, i.e., the victim and E, the original investigative agency, are “Class 9......”