A. The defendant does not inflict any injury on the victim.

Nevertheless, the court below found the defendant guilty of the facts charged of this case. The court below erred by misunderstanding facts and affecting the conclusion of the judgment.

B. The sentence that the court below rendered unfair sentencing (hereinafter referred to as 1,00,000 won) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. 1) The lower court also asserted that the Defendant had the same purport in the lower court’s determination, and the lower court, based on the following: (i) according to the diagnosis of injury and the photographs of injury, the upper part of the upper part of the victim’s upper part is the left part; and (ii) in the victim’s complaint, the victim’s complaint, and the E’s statement, the Defendant was able to d

2. Since the victim submitted a written diagnosis after issuance of the certificate of injury to the victim, the victim and E attempted to enter false facts in the written complaint and written statement with the intent to punish the defendant, if the victim and E attempted to enter false facts in the written complaint and written statement, it is deemed that he / she contained such false information.

the left-hand part of the medical certificate of injury, not the injury.

In full view of the facts that the facts charged in this case could have been written, the Defendant’s assertion was rejected.

2) The following circumstances acknowledged by the lower court based on the evidence duly admitted and investigated by the lower court, i.e., the victim’s statement, although there are differences in the part or process of the victim’s statement, the credibility of the statement appears to be high, and ii) the victim’s photographic injury taken at the time of the instant case’s display of the victim’s statement by consistently stating the part or process of the victim’s statement.