특수상해
The judgment of the court below is reversed.
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.
However, the period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
1. Summary of grounds for appeal;
A. In fact, the Defendant misunderstanding the victim’s breath and breathed the breath of the victim E, but there is no fact that the part of the breath’s breast with the breast’s fladrat was flad by the victim’s left breast or connected with the bladrat with the bladrat.
B. The punishment sentenced by the lower court (six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.
2. Determination
A. The Defendant alleged the same purport in the lower court’s determination as to the assertion of mistake of facts, and the lower court rejected the above assertion by providing detailed reasons for the same in detail at the 2nd 13 to 20 conduct of the said judgment.
The court below established the following circumstances based on the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court below and the court of the first instance: ① The victim was behind the victim’s left-hand satise by the investigative agency and the court of the first instance from the written statement prepared on October 5, 2015 on the day of the second case to the investigation agency and the court of the court of the first instance.
(2) The Defendant suffered bodily injury, such as the face-to-face side and the face-to-face in the face-to-face in the face-to-face side and the face-to-face in the face-to-face in the face-to-face in the face-to-face side, in-house, and in-house heat.
In light of the time of preparation and the circumstances, the above injury appears to have occurred from the crime of this case separate from the part of the previous treatment, and unlike the fact that there was a false change in the contents of the above diagnosis.
In addition to the fact that there is no finding of the circumstances, it is recognized that the defendant suffered an injury by considering the back of the victim with the part of the knife of the damaged part, which is a dangerous object, such as the description in this part of the facts charged.
Therefore, this decision of the court below is just and acceptable, and it is alleged by the defendant.