구상금
1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.
Purport of claim and appeal
1..
1. Basic facts
A. The Plaintiff is an insurer who has entered into a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with respect to a car A owned B (hereinafter “Plaintiff”) and the Defendant is an insurer who entered into a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with respect to a car C (hereinafter “Defendant”).
B. A, around 14:25 on December 15, 2013, when driving the Plaintiff’s side, and driving the Plaintiff’s side along the two-lanes, the vehicle at the Defendant’s side, who turn to the left from the opposite direction, is proceeding along the one-lanes of the two-lanes in the vicinity of the Goyang-gu, Seoyang-gu, U.S.-si. Singu.
(hereinafter “instant accident”). C.
On March 11, 2014, the Plaintiff paid KRW 10,610,000 as insurance money for the repair cost of the Plaintiff’s vehicle.
[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, and 3, the purport of the whole pleadings
2. The plaintiff asserted that the accident of this case occurred by the previous negligence of the driver of the vehicle on the part of the defendant, and the defendant asserts to the effect that the driver of the vehicle on the part of the plaintiff was partially negligent.
3. In full view of the overall purport of the pleadings as to the images of evidence Nos. 5, 6, and 7, the Plaintiff’s vehicle was proceeding along the intersection in accordance with green signals; the Defendant’s vehicle used to turn to the left without reducing the speed while going in the opposite direction; the collision part of both vehicles is the front part of the Plaintiff’s front part and the left part of the front part of the vehicle and the front part of the Defendant’s front part of the vehicle; the Plaintiff’s vehicle did not indicate a non-protective left-hand left-hand turn when viewed from the direction of the vehicle to the intersection; rather, it can be recognized that there was a sign prohibiting left-hand turn at the direction of the Plaintiff’s vehicle; thus, the Defendant’s vehicle turned to the left-hand direction.
The driver of any motor vehicle who intends to make a left-hand turn at an intersection where the traffic is not controlled and the driver of any motor vehicle who intends to make a right-hand turn to the right-hand turn is going straight through or right-hand to the intersection.