On the other hand, only the defendant appealed against the part of the above acceptance of the I Burial, and the plaintiff filed an incidental appeal against the part of the claim for the construction cost for the I Burial during the appellate trial, only 2,000,000 won and the damages for delay.

Therefore, the claim for the price of each promotional product and the claim for the cost of construction was excluded from the scope of the judgment of this court, and only the claim for the price of the promotional product and the part of the claim for the cost of construction are subject to the judgment of this court.

The plaintiff's assertion as to the cause of the claim is that the defendant supplied promotional products equivalent to KRW 31,254,000 to the stores located in Gwangju-gu I (hereinafter "I store") operated by the defendant, and completed the construction work of KRW 80,700,00. The defendant received only KRW 10,340,000 as the price for promotional products, and KRW 75,000 as the price for construction work.

Therefore, the defendant is obligated to pay to the plaintiff the total sum of the sales promotional price and the balance of the construction work, as well as the delayed payment amount of KRW 26,614,00.

The details of promotional items (Evidence A 2) presented by the Defendant, asserting that the Plaintiff supplied promotional items equivalent to KRW 31,254,000, to the Defendant’s assertion, is not objective data, and the above amount is not recognized as it is.

Facts of recognition

The defendant, a company running the Smarket business, operated I stores, and requested the plaintiff to supply the promotional items, such as leaflets and posters, whenever the promotional events are held in I stores.

. The above.