2. We examine the judgment of the court below, and there are circumstances where the defendant made efforts to find the defendant as a taxi engineer to lead a normal life after the crime of this case. However, the crime of this case was committed by the defendant by installing game products without permission in collaboration with co-defendants in the court below and operating the illegal game room business. Furthermore, in preparation for the case where illegal game room business is discovered, Co-defendant E was issued monetary compensation to "bab president" in advance and the physical color was displayed, and the illegal business was actually discovered to the investigation agency's statement to the effect that the above E was the actual owner of the business, and the nature of the crime is not weak. The defendant's status and degree of participation in the crime of this case, the period and scale of the crime of this case, and other factors that constitute the defendant's motive, age, occupation, character, environment, family relation, etc., and the defendant's argument that the above crime of this case is unfair is not reasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.