A Imprisonment with prison labor for two years, and for one year, for Defendant B.

【Defendant A, from August 23, 2012, operated the “I”, which is a mobile phone sales store in the Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City H commercial building-1006 from August 23, 2012.

1. Around August 27, 2012, the Defendant forged private document: (a) written the forged resident registration certificate in the name column in the name column of the KS new service contract form in the name column in the name of the victim, which was purchased from the forged identification card dealer, such as the above I, one name J, etc.; and (b) written the “K”, “L”, “L”, “Scheon-gu M” in the resident registration number column, and “K” in the customer registration number column; and (c) written at will a copy of the KS new service contract in the name of K, which is a private document concerning the rights and obligations, by signing the name next to the application column.

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant arbitrarily prepared and forged the private document in Chapter 396 from August 27, 2012 to December 21, 2012, as shown in the list of crimes, including forging one copy of the SKS service new contract under the name of K.

2. Around August 27, 2012, the Defendant submitted at the above I, to the employee in charge of receipt of a mobile phone new application with a total of three mobile phone entry applications, such as one copy of the ST New Contract under the name of K forged as described in the preceding paragraph, and a copy of the forged resident registration certificate under the name of K, one of which cannot be identified through the N agency representativeO that knew the forged name.

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising, the Defendant exercised a total of 396 mobile phone entry application documents, which are private documents forged from August 27, 2012 to December 21, 2012, and exercised a copy of the resident registration certificates of 132, which are forged official documents.

3. The Defendant’s fraud, around August 27, 2012, did not have any capacity or intent to pay the mobile phone price even if he/she purchased the mobile phone in the Victim SK Telecom. The name of the “K” submitted to the victim company.