2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

A. The plaintiffs and the defendants are both married couple.

In the event of the cancellation of a contract at the time of the mutual address of the factory sales contract, F, and E company seller in G H company, the buyer of the Plaintiff C, the buyer’s total purchase price of KRW 330 million (including KRW 8 million), KRW 50 million, the remainder of KRW 280 million, and the buyer will waive the down payment.

The transfer of factory under a special agreement shall cooperate to ensure that all products, such as ABS processed products and non-processed products, including all factory facilities, including five tons of 5 tons in total, 1 ton, 30 ton in total, 30 ton in total, electric carper, mincator, mincator, and mincator, are mutually beneficially mutually beneficially mutually in all parts of the business, including supply and purchase places, and non-processed products.

B. On November 24, 2008, the Plaintiffs decided to acquire “E” from the Defendants, and concluded a factory sales contract for plastic recycling chain (hereinafter “instant contract”) with the following contents, and run plastic recycling business in the same trade name starting around that time.

C. On May 6, 2009, the Defendants were divided into 309 square meters prior to I on June 17, 2009 into 75 square meters prior to I on June 17, 2009, and 234 square meters prior toO. On August 23, 2011, the land category was changed to the factory site. On August 26, 201, the Defendants were combined into 891 square meters for K factory site and 26 square meters for M factory site and 992 square meters for I factory site;

J on January 11, 2010, the land category was changed to a factory site on January 11, 2010, and on the same day, it became 1,653 square meters of J factory site due to the combination with L/L factory site with 108 square meters;

K 891 square meters of land for a factory, L 108 square meters of land for a factory, and M 26 square meters of land for a factory. On January 5, 2010, each of the factories listed in attached Tables 1 through 3 (hereinafter “instant factories”) on each of the above lands was newly constructed on each of the above lands, and from May 2010 to May 2010, “N Company” runs a recycling plastic manufacturing business, etc., the same type of business as the plaintiffs in the instant factory.

[Ground for Recognition: Unsatisfy facts, Gap evidence 1 through 3 (which has a serial number).