부동산증여원인무효소송
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.
1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is merely to add "A" to "a mental ability or intelligence that can reasonably be determined based on the meaning or result of his act based on normal perception and towing ability," and "a mental capacity shall be determined individually in relation to a specific juristic act (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2001Da10113, Oct. 11, 2002)" between the third and fourth instances of the judgment of the court of first instance, and "B" is not "a valid from 16th to 17th", and "A" is merely to be deemed "a valid from 2,9,10,13, 13, 20 to 22 second instances of the judgment of the court of first instance and the fact-finding with respect to the head of Gdong community service center head of the court of first instance and the head of Gdong community service center head of Gdong community service center head of the court of first instance, and there is no evidence to prove that D's capacity was insufficient as at the time of the judgment of first instance judgment.
2. In conclusion, the judgment of the court of first instance is legitimate, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.