2. The judgment of the defendant shows the attitude of recognizing and opposing the crime of this case, and the fact that there are minor children to support the defendant is favorable to the defendant.

However, the crime of drinking driving is likely to cause serious harm to a third party, who is a minor family member of another group, due to the driver's clibly and widely known judgment, and there is a need for strict punishment. The defendant caused a traffic accident involving the apartment entrance pole as the front part of the vehicle on the 29th day of the evidence record while the defendant was driving without any measures such as checking or training the site immediately after the accident, etc., and the above accident causes a traffic accident involving the front part of the front part of the apartment entrance. The three sides surrounding the front part of the apartment entrance entrance due to the above accident, and is scattered on the adjacent road and delivery, and the defendant's vehicle is considerably damaged, and the degree of the shock seems to have been considerable. The above accident site is adjacent to the entrance of the apartment residents, and even if it was a dangerous situation that could lead to a large human life damage, the defendant was driving a vehicle immediately after the accident, and thus, the defendant cannot be deemed to have been punished too disadvantageous to the defendant and all of the records.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.