When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On July 9, 2014, at the entrance of the first floor, the Defendant: (a) suffered bodily injury, i.e., self-surfed scale, salted scale, etc., which require approximately two weeks of medical treatment to the next victim twice, on the ground that E, the window C, at Changwon-si, was the mother of the victim D (4 years of age), was drinking a ice fright, and that he again carried a ice fright, carried a ice fright, and returned to a ice fright fright.

Summary of Evidence

1. Court statement of the defendant (the second court date);

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of penalties;

2. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse.

3. Part concerning rejection of prosecution under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act;

1. This part of the facts charged

A. On June 14, 2014, around 19:00 on June 14, 2014, the Defendant assaulted the said victim’s her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her herst her

B. At around 21:00 on June 24, 2014, the Defendant left the water for drinking together with the said victim at the same place as the above paragraph (a).

However, if the victim was frightened by drinking water on the water disease as it was, and the victim was frightened by drinking water on the water disease, the defendant was frightened by the victim, and the victim was frightened by the victim.

2. The facts charged in this part of the judgment are crimes falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act and cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act. According to the records, the victim’s legal representative has withdrawn his/her wish to punish the Defendant on December 23, 2014, which is after the prosecution of this case. Thus, this part of the prosecution is dismissed pursuant to Article 327(6) of the Criminal Procedure Act.