1. On May 2, 2016, the Defendant was parked in the vicinity of Busan Island C around Busan on May 2, 2016

D The amount of 300,000 won in cash owned by the victim E in Sona-si was stolen.

2. On May 13, 2016, the Defendant was parked in a parking lot for the building F of Busan Blue-gu around 14:45 on May 13, 2016

Gi30 thefts one bank (the total market value of KRW 2,330,000) consisting of cash, half, etc. owned by the victim H, which was located on board Gi30.

3. On June 13, 2016, the Defendant was parked in the parking lot I located in Busan Special Metropolitan City B around Busan Special Metropolitan City on June 13, 2016

J Each theft of one wall in which cash, gift certificates, etc. owned by the victim Ock-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed W-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each statement;

1. Each investigation report (for 11,17 on a regular basis);

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes on photographing and photographing booms;

1. Relevant Article 329 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment, and the choice of imprisonment for a crime;

1. The reason for sentencing under the former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Articles 38(1)2 and 50 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment of Concurrent Crimes / [the scope of recommending punishment] There is no person [the person who is subject to special sentencing] in the basic area (6 months to 1 year and 6 months) (the decision of sentence] [the person who is subject to special sentencing] [the decision of sentence] shows the attitude of reflecting the defendant's mistake. However, in the case where the appellate court is proceeding with a suspended sentence for the same crime, under the circumstances where the appellate court is proceeding with the suspended sentence, it has committed the same offense under several Acts, and the damage has not been recovered properly, so it is inevitable to punish the same.

In light of the aforementioned circumstances, the punishment as ordered shall be determined by comprehensively taking into account the following circumstances, including the Defendant’s age, sex, intelligence and environment, motive, means and consequence of the commission of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime.