Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

The summary of the facts charged of this case is as follows: "The defendant, around December 26, 2019, committed a crime that falls under Article 307 (2) of the Criminal Act and could not be discussed against the victim's express intent in accordance with Article 312 (23) of the Criminal Act, and even though there was no fact that the victim C had stolen rice at the time when C center chairperson was the victim of the center for older persons, there was a public official in charge of riparian welfare, the head of the D organization, the head of the D organization, the head of E, F, etc., and the victim, among the victims of the case, "the low-age year," made a false representation that "the low-age year, theft of rice 2 rice at the time of the chairperson of the center for older persons, thereby impairing the victim's reputation by openly pointing out false facts," so this is a crime that falls under Article 312 (2) of the Criminal Act and cannot be discussed against the victim's explicit intention. According to the revocation of the complaint and the revocation of punishment attached to the trial record, the victim's dismissal.