beta
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2017.09.22 2017고합199

상해

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 1.5 million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On October 4, 2016, around 19:30 on October 4, 2016, the Defendant suffered an injury, such as “spawn and spawn,” which requires three weeks’ medical treatment, as the victim C (n, 64 years of age) and family problems of the Gangwon Culture and Arts Center located in Gangseo-gu, Seoul Metropolitan City.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. The legal statement of the witness C;

1. Complaint;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to a copy of a usb video recording or medical record;

1. Article 257 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Determination on the assertion by the Defendant and his defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. The abstract of the assertion does not inflict any bodily injury upon the victim;

2. In full view of the following circumstances admitted by the evidence as seen earlier, the fact that the Defendant was in his possession and inflicted an injury on the victim’s hand can be sufficiently recognized.

The above argument by the Defendant cannot be accepted (it is argued to the effect that the Defendant was a mass production rather than protesan, but, in this case, the issue is whether or not the Defendant was injured by the victim, whether or not the goods possessed by the Defendant are protesan or prote delivery is not an obstacle to the establishment of a crime). A) The victim, consistently from the investigative agency to the court, consistently from the investigation agency, consistently with the entry of the Defendant into the entrance of a swimming pool underground parking lot.

At that place, the Defendant had a verbal dispute, and the Defendant’s desire to engage in “forception and desire”;

It is called "Mara," and it has become a trademark.

Then, he returned back to the swimming pool, and the defendant was able to drive away while driving a friendly mountain, and the defendant was able to go back to the post, and the defendant was able to go back to the post.