When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On July 4, 2013, at around 14:10, the Defendant appeared as a witness of the case of violation of the defense law against Gohap, 2012 High Court No. 1356, Gohap 1356, the Incheon District Court 12, which was located in Nam-dong, Nam-gu, Incheon.

During the hearing of the above case, the defendant stated that the attorney's "I am on December 11, 2009" 10 million won was remitted to C to the Internet banking, and this is the answer to the question "I am appropriate for I am."

I answer ", according to the reply, I do not know about the question " which is not C, but D, which is the transfer of KRW 10 million to December 11, 2009."

I answer “I,” and “D may know well.”

I answer "," and "I cannot call C's name here which the witness sent to the prosecution by facsimile."

How is crypta

“Influent, E.W. L.W. L.W.”

“The testimony was made.”

However, the facts were not true that the defendant remitted 10 million won to C on July 21, 2009, and D was a real estate broker who was aware of being introduced through a person who was a real estate broker.

Accordingly, the defendant made a false statement contrary to his memory and raised perjury.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement made to C by the police in the protocol; and

1. The defendant asserts to the effect that on December 11, 2009, a person who changed the name of the remitter who was sent by facsimile to the prosecution from D from December 11, 2009 into C does not change the name of the remitter as above, and that at the time of testimony, D gave testimony as stated in the facts charged because it did not memory, and thus, he did not make a false statement.

According to the records of this case, the following facts are revealed.