However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. A special intimidation Defendant: (a) around December 29, 2018, at the residence of the victim C(25 years of age) located in Gwanak-gu in Seoul Special Metropolitan City (Seoul Special Metropolitan City) around the new wall, the Defendant threatened the victim by carrying a knife on the ground that the knife was the knife of the knife; (b) “I will be dead of the knife of the knife; and (c) I will be dead of the knife of the knife.”

2. On January 1, 2019, the Defendant, at around 22:00, was living in the said victim’s residence, opened an entrance with a card using the fact that he had registered his card at the entrance entrance of the victim, and entered the entrance into the said entrance, and intrudes on the residence of the victim.

3. In the time and place set forth in the above 2. Paragraph 2., the Defendant: (a) returned home to the victim; and (b) collected home tools, etc. from the victim; and (c) discarded the tables, which are owned by the victim, into two sides; and (d) destroyed the market value by destroying the Handphones.

4. At the time and place set forth in the above 2.1 above, the Defendant: (a) stated that he would die before the victim; (b) stated that the victim “I will die; (c)” and carried the victim’s food knife (the total length: 27.5 cm; 15 cm; length: 15 cm); and (d) knife the knife and the knife (the total length: 22 cm; 8 cm; length of day: 8 cm); and (c) stated that “I will die, thrown down the knife, and thrown down the knife.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. C police statement;

1. Records of seizure and the list of seizure;

1. 112 Reporting case handling table; and

1. On-site photographs and reports on the results of field identification;

1. According to each of the above evidence including the victim's statement and investigation reports, all of the facts constituting the crime in the judgment can be acknowledged.

As to the special intimidation of Paragraph 1 of the ruling, the defendant is the case.