Defendant

If A does not pay the above fine, it shall be 100.

Defendant

A is the representative director of Defendant B.

1. A person who registered his/her fire-fighting system installation business or an order issued under the aforesaid Act and the fire safety standards should be constructed in compliance with the Defendant’s construction of a simplified sprinkler system, which is a fire-fighting system, in Seongbuk-gu Seoul, at around November 2012, the Defendant installed a simple sprinkler system without complying with the fire safety standards for the equipment of a simplified sprinkler system, such as failing to connect and install the test equipment for testing the water flow testing system from the end of the pipelines located in the water flow testing station.

2. Defendant B, a representative director, committed a violation as referred to in the preceding paragraph in relation to the Defendant’s business.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant A’s legal statement

1. Reports on violations of fire-fighting-related Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Reporting, processing and informing the commencement of construction of fire-fighting systems;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on the results of on-site verification of specific matters pointed out;

1. Relevant Articles 36 and 12 (1) of the Fire-Fighting System Installation Business Act and subparagraph 2 of Article 36 and Article 12 (1) of the same Act, and subparagraph B of Article 39 and subparagraph 2 of Article 36 of the same Act and Article 12 (1) of the same Act;

1. Defendant A to be detained in a workhouse: Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act or more.