The defendant is a person who is engaged in the work related to data recovery, and the victim B is a business trip.

피고인은 2019. 10. 28. 10:00경 서울 서초구 C, 8층 D호 사무실 내에서, 출장 택배업을 위해 찾아온 피해자가 물건이 늦게 나오게 되었다는 이유로 피고인에게 삿대질하며 “야이 새꺄, 준비도 안 해놓고 바쁜 사람 기다리게 해놓고, 야 이 나쁜 새꺄, 내가 택배나 한다고 무시하냐, 이 자식아”라며 고성으로 욕설하면서 피고인을 모욕하자 피해자는 이와 같이 피고인을 모욕한 행위로 인하여 모욕죄로 약식 기소됨(벌금 30만 원). , 이에 화가 나 피해자의 가슴을 양손으로 밀치는 방법으로 피해자를 폭행하였다.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police interrogation protocol on the accused and B;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to reports on occurrence (fence) and investigation (record 50 pages);

1. Relevant Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. A fine not exceeding 500,000 won to be suspended;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act (100,000 won per day);

1. Article 59(1) of the suspended sentence: (a) of the Criminal Act: (b) the accused is led to confession and reflect; (c) the accused is the first offender who has no criminal history; (d) the damage caused by the Defendant’s assault appears to be minor; and (e) the victim was indicted for an insulting offense due to the insulting act of the Defendant. As seen earlier, there are circumstances to consider the circumstances surrounding the Defendant’s assaulting the victim; (d) the criminal conciliation procedure commenced to resolve the instant assault case and the said insult case; (e) the victim’s failure to observe the unilateral conciliation date; and (e) the sentence against the Defendant shall be suspended, taking into account all the circumstances, such as the fact that