When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On August 4, 2016, at around 00:22, the Defendant: (a) 112, who was drunkly under the influence of the Defendant prior to the DD driving range located in Si of Si of Si of Si of Si of Si of Si of Si of Si of Si of Si of Si of Si of Si of Si of Si of Si of Si of Si of Si of Si of Si of Si of Si of Si of Si of Si of Si of Si of Si of Si of Si of Si of Si of Si of Si of Si of Si of Si of Si of Si of Si of Si of Si, listened to the details of the report, and tried the Defendant to have the Defendant return to the patrol vehicle on the patrol vehicle after listening to the details of the report; (b) continued to have the said F; (c) interfered with the operation of the vehicle; and (d) obstructed the operation of the patrol vehicle for about 10 minutes after getting off

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of reporting duties and the maintenance of order by police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement concerning F;

1. G statements;

1. Application of statutes, such as photographs of victimized police officers;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act and the choice of a fine concerning the crime;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order has been punished by a fine for the same kind of crime six years prior to the date of punishment, but its mistake is against the defendant, the support for the family under cancer treatment, and other circumstances which form the condition for sentencing, such as the defendant's age, circumstances leading to the case, character and conduct and environment, shall be determined as ordered by taking into consideration.