When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

[2015Gohap1582] Around 04:30 on September 6, 2015, the Defendant committed assault against the victim, such as the victim C (the 19-year-old-old-si-old-si-old-si-old-si (hereinafter “D convenience store”). A while under the influence of alcohol, the victim was under the influence of alcohol, “if other persons who drink in the table appear to be a juvenile, and have inspected the identification card,” and the victim was under the influence of alcohol, and the victim was under the influence of the alcohol.

[2015Gohap1607] On September 6, 2015, around 10:50 on September 6, 2015, the Defendant, who was arrested as an employee's assault case before the D convenience store located in B and was accused of committing an act of violence, again, found the above convenience store where the victim E (the age of 17) works, and caused the damage to the manager of the Pakistan kept in front of it and caused the damage to its utility.

Summary of Evidence

[2015 High Court Decision 1582]

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. C’s statement (2015 high-level 1607);

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. E statements;

1. Application of statutes on field photographs;

1. Relevant Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 366 of the Criminal Act and Article 266 of the Criminal Act, the choice of fines for the crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;