Defendant

If A does not pay the above fine, 100,000.

1. From January 6, 2016, Defendant A is the representative director of the B Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “B”) who is a waste collection and transportation company located in the Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan City, Chungcheongnam-gu, Seoul Metropolitan City (hereinafter “B”).

A person discharging industrial wastes shall dispose of wastes generated from his/her place of business by entrustment to a person who has obtained permission for waste disposal business, a person who has filed a report on waste disposal, a person who installs and operates waste disposal facilities, a person who has obtained permission for construction waste disposal business, or

Nevertheless, around May 14, 2018, the Defendant entrusted the disposal of 8.09 tons of industrial wastes generated from the foregoing two places of business (hereinafter “instant goods”) to D, which is an unauthorized waste disposal business entity.

2. Defendant B, at the time and place specified in the above paragraph (1), the Defendant, the representative of the Defendant, committed the above violation in relation to the Defendant’s business.

Summary of Evidence

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the investigation report of the suspect interrogation protocol of Defendant A on some of the suspect interrogation protocol of Defendant A by the police officer as to Defendant A (Listening to the statement statement of Defendant A), the entry vehicle register, the electronic tax invoice site photograph (dial, adjacent photographic, etc.)

1. Article 65 subparagraph 11 of the Wastes Control Act, Article 18 (1) of the Wastes Control Act, and Article 67, Article 65 subparagraph 11 of the Act, and Article 18 (1) of the Act, and Article 67, Article 65 subparagraph 11 of the Wastes Control Act, and Article 18 (1) of the

1. Defendant A to be detained in a workhouse: Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act;

1. The Defendants of the provisional payment order: Determination on the Defendants and their defense counsel’ assertion under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. Defendant A recognized the instant goods as a recyclable plastic, and Defendant A collected and removed the instant goods from the Plaintiff F (hereinafter “F”) to export recyclable plastics. Thus, Defendant A’s waste.