However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

The defendant is a nationality foreigner of Pakistan, and the facts were to enter the Republic of Korea and to be employed, but they had the intent to enter the Republic of Korea by obtaining a visa, pretended as if they were invited for business purposes.

On October 2015, the Defendant: (a) sent a photo and passport copy to the broman, a staff member of the Republic of Korea to arrange for the issuance of a false nameless visa to the Republic of Korea; (b) requested the Defendant to make a visa available to the Republic of Korea; and (c) explained to the effect that the Defendant, through the Internet advertising site D, posted promotional materials to the effect that he/she would contact the F in charge of overseas trade of “E” to the chip World Cup manufacturer, a staff member of the Defendant, etc. for the purpose of purchasing the machinery by contact with the F in charge of overseas trade of “E”; and (d) sent a broto so that two employees, including the Defendant, may visit Korea to the Republic of Korea to proceed with the process of

H. H. H. H. H. and received from F relevant documents, such as the e-mail e-mail.

On October 29, 2015, the Defendant filed an application for a short-term permanent visa (C-3) with the U.S. consul located in the Republic of Korea in U.S. located in U.S. on or around October 29, 2015, and the Defendant submitted a visa issuance document to the public official in charge of issuing the visa to the effect that the representative G of the “E” is inviting the Defendant to attract the Defendant for business purposes.

Accordingly, the defendant filed a false visa in collusion with a person who is not a person with a false name.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes on the written accusation;

1. Article 94 subparagraph 3 of the relevant Act, subparagraph 2 of Article 94 and Article 7-2 of the Immigration Control Act, Article 30 of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Sentence of punishment under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act: Imprisonment with prison labor for one year or more: Reasons for mitigation of a period of stay of execution: confession, absence of domestic criminal records, etc.;